Over the past few weeks I’ve been spending my free time taking part in the Google AI competition (organised by the university of waterloo).
While I didn’t end up doing so well (I was disqualified for taking just over the 1 second per move permitted in one of my games), I thought I’d post how I went about the problem. Many of the other contestants used similar algorithms, but for those who haven’t been following here’s the full thinking behind it:
Last week was my birthday, so I’m now the proud owner of the new Tony Hawk game – “Ride”.
I’d seen some really bad reviews on-line, so I wasn’t 100% sure what to expect, but having played it quite a bit now I’ve got to give it great marks – and for anyone considering buying it I thought I’d post my feedback.
Several other reviews have cited difficulty in using the controller (a life-size skateboard), and a steep learning curve; I certainly haven’t found either any greater than a normal console game.
In fact, I can only assume that the poor reviews have come from gamers who have been playing with game controllers for so long that they can’t remember what it’s like to learn to control a game from scratch – Yeah, at first I had to think really carefully about how to perform moves – but I have to stop and think whenever another game says “press triangle” – so I can’t say it has a tougher learning curve than any other game.
Another problem I’ve read about is a couple of physics bugs – here I’ll admit I have had a couple of moments where the camera has got stuck in a weird position somehow (I’m assuming its’ a problem with the normal on a couple of objects), although it’s fixed itself within a few seconds. In many hours of playing I’ve only seen this happen twice though – and I’m not sure I’d want a skateboarding game with absolutely perfect physics – it would be far too depressing 
All in all, I think the controller works great – and I feel like I’ve had a thorough workout after a long skate session. I haven’t found any time yet… but I’m hoping I can get the controller wired up to my laptop – Tux Racer could get a lot more fun
With all that said, I’ll leave you with a video :
When it comes to security, I’m often shocked by how much people are won over by a little social engineering – but I was even more shocked this morning.
Here are some regular examples of things we routinely see people do – all of which are potentially highly dangerous, and could easily lead to an attacker stealing your bank details, work information, or your entire computer:
But what I saw today was even more shocking (to me) – I was invited to join a facebook group, ostensibly to help find a couple who lost thier camera (there’s no reason to suppose that’s not actually what the group is doing, so feel free to go ahead and join).
When I looked at the page, it has this message:
TO MASS INVITE
1)Click "Invite people to join"
2)Delete all the text in your address bar and replace it with the following
javascript:elms=document.getElementById('friends').getElementsByTagName('li');
for(var fid in elms){if(typeof elms[fid] === 'object'){fs.click(elms[fid]);}}
Then hit enter
In fact, looking at the code, that does look like it does what it says on the tin, so nothing dangerous – “what’s the big deal” you might ask?
Well that message is asking you to paste executable source code into your browser, which will run the code as if it was code trusted by facebook
i.e. whatever code you paste into your browser window, can do whatever it wants to do with your facebook account – and I suspect very very few of the people who followed the instructions actually understood exactly what the code was going to do – although I know for a fact that a lot of people did follow the instructions.
So that’s another one to add to the list – Never copy and paste anything into your browser that doesn’t begin with http: or https:
Interesting news today as a Oxford university researcher who’s pointed out that the human brain is only capable of dealing with 150 social relationships.
Robin Dunbar, the researcher involved, is the namesake of “Dunbar’s number” – suggesting our neocortex is only capable of managing a maximum of 150 social connections.
According to several news reports, he’s currently studying social networking sites such as facebook, and preliminary results suggest that they show exactly the same pattern.
So what about people who follow thousands of people on twitter? Well his work seems to suggest that those people simply can’t be listening to the majority of them – although there may be up to 150 people (including contacts not on twitter) who they have a real social connection with.
Another developer here suggested this to me (Thanks Rich!) – but every time I use it I think it’s really useful, so I thought I’d share it.
When you’re working with a python package like “product.section.part”, you end up with a directory tree like so:
product.section.part
+ product
+ section
+ part
- module.py
Now, navigating through these directories is a pain – each time you want to edit module.py, you find yourself typing something like:
cd p[tab]p[tab]/s[tab]p[tab] [editor] m[tab]
# (the "/" is required to get past the .egg-info file) # i.e. this expands to
$ cd product.section.part/section/part/ $ [editor] module.py
Rich simply added a simple function to my .bashrc to do this automatically – so I now type
zcd p[tab] editor m[tab] #i.e. this expands to $ zcd product.section.part/ $ [editor] module.py
- It’s much simpler, and makes moving between packages that little bit nicer !
Here’s the script to add to your ~/.bashrc:
function zcd() {
X=`echo $1 | sed -e "s/\\./\\//g"`
cd $1/$X
}
Here’s a question for the non-developers among our readers:
What web framework is this a screen-shot of?
Answer:
(If you answered “Wordpress” you’re wrong)
- it’s actually from something called TinyMCE – which happens to be used for editing blog posts as part of wordpress – but it’s certainly not “wordpress” – it’s commonly used when building all kinds of sites – using all kinds of frameworks.
What wordpress actually looks like (for the people who build wordpress sites):
Wordpress:
You may not have got much from looking at that screen-shot – so, for comparison, here are what two other common web frameworks look like to the people that use them to build websites:
Turbogears:
Drupal:
The chances are that you probably wouldn’t have been able to guess which one of those was which [unless you are a developer who has worked on one or more of them for an extended period of time].
Which brings me back to the post title – What is the greatest web framework ever?
Well that depends on what you’ve got experience with, and what site you want to build.
For some reason, people often seem to thing there’s a golden bullet to solve all their problems – both developers and clients. During a discussion the other day I likened this argument to saying
“Excel is great – it’s the best Application ever”
- and from that point forward only using Excel – for anything.
You want to play some music while you work, so you fire up Excel, and start rocking out – Sure, some might say that Excel just isn’t as good at playing music as iTunes – but you carry on because “It’s the best Application ever”
Then you want to check your emails – so you fire up Excel again (Your colleagues are sniggering behind you as you ask the jumping paperclip how many new emails you’ve had today – but you use it all the same…)
Oh hang on – you don’t!
Yet as developers we often find that we’re required to build a site using a specific technology – because “It’s the best application ever”
If you’re creating a blog then wordpress is really great – if you’re editing a blog post then there’s a TinyMCE already built-in, along with blog comments, and the ability to list blog posts in reverse-chronological order on the frontpage. If you don’t want those features – or you want other features, then you’re going to have to start building those things from scratch – that means no easy-editing form, no automatic page generation etc (unless you code it yourself).
Google Wave is written using GWT – which is a great tool for their specific requirements as it lets you design web applications that look like desktop applications in a very nice manner (if you’re a pythonista then you’d probably try something like pyjamas for that).
One of the web apps I spend a lot of time in is written in a mixture of Python and ANSI C (no web framework at all) – and that’s the best decision for that application and it’s requirements.
Another project I work on is in Zope – and another one is based around the Shindig OpenSocial framework – again, they’re the right frameworks for the tasks at hand
- and they’re all different because the tasks are all different.
One of the applications I work on recently dropped support for python 2.4 – and much to my surprise I found out buildbot was failing – despite the instructions to use the 2.5 interpreter.
We had the following code as part of the a collective.buildout:project configuration:
build-sequence =
python2.5 bootstrap.py
./bin/buildout -t 50
test-sequence =
python2.5 bin/tests -v --v
But looking at the logs, this was being re-written to use “python” (i.e. the version the buildslave was running on) during the buildout.
I guess I could have created separate buildouts for 2.5 /2.6 buildslaves for these projects – but having one buildbot buildout is just simpler.
I found that calling python by it’s full path in the configuration has avoided this issue – although it does mean maintaining different project sections for different python versions.
i.e.
build-sequence =
/usr/local/bin/python2.5 bootstrap.py
./bin/buildout -t 50
test-sequence =
/usr/local/bin/python2.5 bin/tests -v --v
I’ve just released our browser statistics for 2009 over on the viral ad network blog – but I thought I’d cross-post this here.
I found this chart quite amazing – it seems that users on Windows 7 have chosen Firefox over Internet Explorer.
Are we only seeing statistics for technical users of Windows 7 (i.e. those who upgraded early)? I don’t know – but here’s the chart:
windows-7-web-browser-share-2009
(more stats are here)
I’m amazed that this has barely been fully covered in the UK press, but the Climate Research Unit at the University of East Anglia has been hacked, and a large amount of data (and emails) released onto the web?
Why is this so interesting? Well for one thing, the CRU have come under question quite a lot in the past for refusing access to their raw data – effectively refusing other scientists the chance to validate or reject their research. The Wall Street journal has read the emails released, and reports:
“Many of the email exchanges discussed ways to decline such [FOIA] requests for information, on the grounds that the data was confidential or was intellectual property. In other email exchanges related to the FOIA requests, some U.K. researchers asked foreign scientists to delete all emails related to their work for the upcoming IPCC summary. In others, they discussed boycotting scientific journals that require them to make their data public.”
Now a lot of the data is publicly available, it will be interesting to see what independent researchers make of the data.
The leak is also incredibly important because the CRU is one of the main research departments in the world on climate change – and it’s research changes both public and national opinion.
While I still haven’t got around to releasing my python port of the yui-compressor (I will soon, I promise), my plan had originally been to extend the compressor into an optimising compiler for javascript – but I just stumbled upon the a Google project that seems to have beaten me to it.
The Closure Compiler (google code page) does exactly that – it takes your javascripts and optimises them for both filesize and run-time.
I haven’t looked too deep yet, but it seems that it uses the parser from Rhino, and augments it with an implementation of a javascript AST, and an optimiser that works on the generated AST.
The Closure compiler is written in Java – anyone who feels like working on a python version is likely to find pynoceros (the python version of Rhino’s parser I annouced a few weeks ago) useful.
